"*" indicates required fields
Common Misperceptions about the Reversal of Roe v. Wade
“The reversal of Roe v. Wade means abortion is now illegal.”
Facts: The Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health overturned Roe v. Wade and returned policymaking on abortion to the legislative process, as in Europe where abortion law is determined by legislation, not court rulings. In Europe, different countries have different laws balancing the interests of the mother and the baby, ranging from abortion being totally prohibited in most cases, to being limited after 10 weeks to 24 weeks, depending on the country.
States may now regulate abortion, and 11 states have made abortion illegal in most circumstances. On the other hand, 21 states and the District of Columbia have acted to protect abortion as a right and/or expand abortion access. Voters and their elected representatives now have the power to decide what their state laws on abortion should say.
“Some states have banned abortion with no exceptions.”
Facts: All of the states that have outlawed abortion make an exception for the health/life of the mother. Some of these states also make exceptions for abortions before 6 weeks of pregnancy, for severe birth defects and/or for cases of rape or incest. Federal Republican lawmakers have also recently introduced legislation that would limit abortion nationwide to the first 15 weeks of pregnancy; this bill also includes exceptions for rape, incest and the life and health of the mother.
“The reversal of Roe v. Wade means contraception will now be banned.”
Facts: Fringe efforts to ban contraception lack political support and are not constitutional.
A poll commissioned by Independent Women’s Voice shows that 84% of likely Republican primary voters support safe access to contraceptives, with 74% strongly supporting. This finding is consistent across gender, age, and education. The poll also found that these voters draw a clear distinction between methods that prevent pregnancy, such as the pill and IUDs, and medications that end pregnancy.
The Supreme Court in 1965 said married couples have a constitutional right to buy and use contraceptives, and extended that to unmarried people in a 1972 decision. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health did not change this.
“The reversal of Roe v. Wade means the morning-after pill (also known as Plan B or emergency contraception) will now be banned.”
Facts: All types of FDA-approved forms of birth control remain accessible in all 50 states. In fact, insurance companies are compelled to cover all types of birth control with no copays, and emergency birth control (also known as Plan B) is available over the counter, in all 50 states, without a prescription. Nothing about the Dobbs decision changed this.
But sadly, rumors, misinformation, and exaggerations abound. According to Women’s Health Magazine: “On Twitter, some users spread false information about a supposed ban on Plan B in Tennessee, which was inaccurate. A new law puts restrictions on the method in which medical abortion pills are prescribed, and doesn’t impact emergency contraception, the Tennessean reported.” And of new abortion restrictions in general, Women’s Health reports that they “do not pertain to emergency contraceptives, such as Plan B, or in vitro fertilization (IVF).”
“Abortion bans will outlaw care for ectopic pregnancy.”
Facts: No. There will be no changes in the treatment of ectopic pregnancies.
Treatment for ectopic pregnancy and abortion are not the same. An ectopic pregnancy occurs when a fertilized egg implants in a woman’s fallopian tube or ovary instead of her uterus. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists says that ectopic pregnancy “cannot result in the survival of a baby and entails a very substantial risk of maternal death or disability.” The medical definition of “abortion” is removal of an embryo and placenta from the uterus. Since ectopic pregnancies occur outside of the uterus, their removal is not an abortion.
The Planned Parenthood website previously provided clear information on this topic, saying:
- “Abortion is a medical procedure that when done safely, ends a pregnancy that’s in your uterus.”
- “Ectopic pregnancies are unsafely outside of your uterus (usually in the fallopian tubes), and are removed with a medicine called methotrexate or through a laparoscopic surgical procedure.”
- “The medical procedures for abortions are not the same as the medical procedures for an ectopic pregnancy.”
But each of these statements has been removed or altered since the Dobbs decision.
“Abortion bans will outlaw care for miscarriage.”
Facts: No. Miscarriage care is protected by law.
As commonly understood, abortion is an intervention that ends a pregnancy. A miscarriage is a pregnancy loss. Some miscarriage patients require medical treatment, and sometimes the treatment, such as a Dilation and Extraction (or “D&E”) procedure, which clears the uterus of fetal tissue, are similar to those performed on abortion patients. And sometimes miscarriage is treated with drugs that are similarly used to cause chemical abortions. The critical difference, of course, is that in the case of miscarriage the pregnancy has already been lost.
Among medical providers, the term “spontaneous abortion” is used to describe a miscarriage. What most people think of simply as “abortion” is called “induced abortion” in the medical world. But the two events are still distinct. Even Texas, the state with the most restrictive new abortion law, makes it clear in other statutes that healthcare providers can legally act to “remove a dead, unborn child whose death was caused by spontaneous abortion.” Therefore, miscarriage care is protected by law.
“Most Americans want abortion to be legal.”
Facts: It’s not so simple. Most Americans (including majorities of both Republicans and Democrats) want abortion to be legal in some cases and illegal in some cases. Only 8% of adults say abortion should be against the law in all cases, without exception, while just 19% say abortion should be legal in all cases, without exception, according to Pew Research Center. Most Americans fall in the middle, supporting some restrictions and exceptions. Majorities want abortion to be legal early in pregnancy, and illegal later in pregnancy. Majorities support exceptions for a threat to the life/health of the mother and in cases of rape.
When it comes to a 15-week limit on abortion, public opinion shows more Americans support than oppose such a policy. A Wall Street Journal poll from April 2022 shows 48% in favor, 43% opposed. A Harvard-Harris poll from just after the Dobbs decision shows 72% of people think abortion should be limited to 15 weeks (or less).
If you care about more than the single issue of abortion, which will be an ongoing fight, your voice can make an difference now on other issues that matter.
Cost Increases
What causes inflation?
Inflation is when rising prices on goods and services consumes more of your income. In other words, you are paying more for the same quantity or less. There are many different causes of inflation, including excessive government spending which can lead to a flood of cash in the economy (which makes the cash worth less), and an increase in prices like food and fuel.
A healthy inflation rate is about 2%. In April 2021, for the first time in recent history, the nation’s inflation rate hit 4.2%. Since then, this figure has risen, hitting 9.1% in June 2021, the highest rate in over 40 years.
This is a serious cause for concern: Prolonged and excessive inflation can lead to scarcity of basic goods. Eventually, the value of money diminishes to nothing or nearly nothing. When this occurs, economies can break down.
How does inflation affect Americans?
Inflation is a kitchen-table concern. Rising prices reduce workers’ real wages and reduce everyone’s purchasing power to obtain the goods and services they need. Inflation also devalues savings and erodes retirement dollars.
Inflation is a tax on all consumers, but not everyone is impacted the same way. Rising costs for goods such as food and gasoline are much more deeply felt by low-income, working poor, and elderly Americans.
Also, prices tend to increase on basic needs like food, shelter, and energy more than on luxury goods. To understand even more about inflation click here.
Why is the cost of gas so high?
Since taking office, President Joe Biden has actively worked to make it harder for the U.S. oil and gas industry to operate. Less oil, and higher costs to produce oil, means higher prices for fuel.
Despite the large oil company names on gas stations , 60% of the 116,641 American gas stations are owned by an individual or family that owns a single store.
As these energy companies and gas stations are forced to pay more to produce oil and gas, the costs are passed on to the customers.
Source: The Association for Convenience & Fuel Retailing (NACS), American Energy Alliance
Violence and Crime
How much did gun violence deaths increase for people under 18 in 2020?
According to the Gun Violence Archive, the number of people under the age of 18 killed in gun violence increased by 39% in 2020.
And it is only getting worse. Time Magazine reported: “Since 2020, children’s hospitals have been dealing with a record surge in shooting-victim patients, with many on track to eclipse their previous totals.” This year, the number killed will likely be even larger.
What’s contributing to the increase in violence across the United States?
2020 witnessed the largest single-year murder increase in modern American history with murders climbing nearly 30% from the previous year. In 2021, the U.S. murder rate increased again with major cities such as New York, Minneapolis, and Los Angeles reporting upticks.
The most dramatic increase in murders began after the tragic death of George Floyd on May 25, 2020. Experts have attributed the rise in violence to factors like the reduction in proactive policing, progressive District Attorney bail reforms in many cities that make it hard to keep criminals, even repeat offenders, behind bars, a steep decline in felony prosecutions, and the reduction in police resources and presence as a consequence of the “defund the police” movement.
Parents Rights
Are schools developing and using “gender support plans” to change students’ identities, names, and pronouns without parental consent or knowledge?
Yes. In school districts across the country, staff teach children about the gender spectrum and “affirm” their students’ chosen gender identities.
What used to be viewed as “gender non-comforming” - e.g. a tomboy - is now lumped under the transgender umbrella. For a gender questioning child, school staff, without parental consent, put gender support plans into place, which detail arrangements for bathrooms, locker room and overnight trip accommodations, as well as the child’s chosen name and pronouns. Schools often hide the new identity from the parents by using the biological name and pronouns with parents. Parents in numerous states, including Leon County and Clay County, Florida, Iowa, Massachusetts, Wisconsin, Virginia, Maryland, and California are suing school districts for crafting these secret plans.
Is it true that public schools have withheld information about sexual assault from parents?
Yes. Last year, a Loudoun County school administration came under fire for covering up the sexual assault of a female student that occurred in the bathroom of the school. The assaulter was a male student who identified as “gender-fluid.”
The assault was not publicized until the assaulter assaulted another female at a different school in the district. The principal of the school issued an apology months later for failing to “provide the safe, welcoming, affirming environment that we aspire to provide.” The family of at least one of the girls who was assaulted has filed a civil lawsuit against the school.
Earlier this year, there was a similar case at an Alexandria High School in which the school kept parents in the dark for months about an alleged assault on school grounds that resulted in an arrest for rape, forcible sodomy, and aggravated sexual battery.
Is there a better way to give parents more control over their children’s education?
Yes. Instead of funding systems, funding should follow students so parents can make educational choices that reflect their values and pull their children out of schools that seek to indoctrinate, rather than educate. School choice policies, such as Education Savings Accounts (ESAs), vouchers, and tax credit scholarships fund students directly, rather than funding schools. As CRT and radical gender ideology become more mainstream and pervasive in public education, school choice is more important than ever before.
Women’s Sports
Is it true that an intact biological male competed on the University of Pennsylvania women’s swim team and shared a locker room with female athletes?
Yes, Lia (formerly Will) Thomas competed on the women’s swim team during the 2021-22 school year. The best woman swimmer hoped to beat the record by 0.8 seconds; Lia beat it by 38 seconds, setting an out-of-reach record for female athletes who hoped for victories, records, and competitive opportunities at nationals. Despite Lia still having male genitalia and continuing to date women; Lia shared the locker room with female teammates, who were told not to complain.
Source: New York Times; New York Post; The Daily Mail
Do men possess a significant athletic advantage over females?
Yes. There is at least a 10 to 12% difference between male and female athletic performance. Scientists regard this difference not simply as a difference in human variation between top athletes and others, but as a difference, on average, between the two biological sexes.
While there are, of course, some very talented female athletes who can beat many male athletes, the best female athletes still stand little chance against the top male athletes in their sport.
How serious is the threat to women’s sports today?
At least 19 state athletic associations allow athletes to compete according to their gender identity without restriction, meaning without surgery or hormone therapy. The NCAA allows biological males to compete on women’s teams once they have completed one calendar year of testosterone suppression treatment.
In some states that have adopted equal rights amendments to their constitutions, public schools are prohibited from barring males - regardless of how they identify - from playing on women’s sports teams. In Massachusetts, for example, boys are allowed to try out for and compete on girls’ high school field hockey teams.
Recently, the federal government has taken steps to require (not just allow) schools to let male athletes play on female teams and against female athletes.
In February 2021, the House of Representatives passed H.R.5, the so-called Equality Act, which redefines “sex” to include “gender identity.” If passed, this law would require schools and athletic associations across the country to open up girls’ and women’s sports to male-bodied athletes who self-identify as female.
Most recently, the Department of Education released proposed changes to Title IX which would replace “sex” with “gender” and require schools to allow male-bodied athletes who identify as female to compete on women’s sports teams.
Is there really a movement to eliminate sex-segregated sports?
Yes, efforts to eliminate single-sex sports are picking up steam. Some activists argue that sex is a “social construct” and that sex segregation in athletic competitions should be prohibited. Others have argued that allowing males and females to compete in separate divisions reinforces pernicious gender stereotypes and undermines honest evaluation of athletic ability.
Writing recently in Newsweek, Professor Robyn Ryle says that “sports remain one of the last strongholds for the cult of gender differences.” Ryle claims that sex is not a meaningful category when it comes to competitive sport. Activists like these seek to eliminate single-sex teams altogether.
Health Care
How can the government make health care more accessible?
Our current job-based health insurance model is outdated, inequitable, leaves many people behind, and restricts choices for patients. This distorts the market and drives up premiums. We need to make individual health insurance as affordable and available as employer-based insurance.
Why is health care so expensive? Is there a way to make it more affordable and more accountable to patients?
Hidden prices, due to the lack of price transparency (knowing what something will cost before you buy it), contribute to high prices in our system. Policymakers can lower prices by making them more transparent. The vast majority of healthcare spending (over 90%) is non-emergent or “shoppable.”
Patients should be free to shop. In fact, price transparency could lead to reductions in healthcare expenditures by as much as 40%. That’s $11,000 per family per year.
Childcare Options
How can the government make child care more affordable?
Child care would become more affordable if we got rid of unnecessary and even counterproductive daycare facility regulations. Some regulations are important to ensure that daycare facilities are safe for children, but many have nothing to do with safety or enhancing quality and just drive costs up and eliminate competition for the bigger suppliers.
A Mercatus Center study found that relaxing the child-to-staff ratio — a measure not associated with quality — by one child could reduce costs for parents by up to $1,890 a year. Overregulation is one reason the number of home-based daycare centers decreased by half from 2005 to 2017.
Will childcare subsidies reduce costs for parents?
No. While qualifying daycare users may pay less personally, other users and taxpayers will have to cover the additional costs. Whenever the government subsidizes something, prices go up. For example, college subsidies were meant to make college more affordable but instead made prices soar. Healthcare costs have soared since the passage of the Affordable Care Act. Creating daycare subsidies would have a similar effect on prices.
What better ways would help parents with child care?
If we want to help parents, we need to give them more choices, not fewer. Reducing onerous regulations will reduce compliance costs for facilities and give parents more options at lower prices. Consolidating and improving child tax benefits would also make it easier for parents to make whatever care choices make sense for their families.
header 1
header 2
header 3
header 4
header 5
header 6
Paragraph